JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 19, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Helbert Acosta Vs Cruz Blanca Eps

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Apertura De Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T-608-08. La Sala Observa Que No Se Ha Acudido A El Juez, Que En Primera Instancia, Conoció De La Acción De Tutela De La Referencia, Adicionalmente, No Se Evidencia Que El Presente Caso Se Enmarque Dentro De Alguna De Las Causales De Excepción Que Permitan Que La Corte Pueda Conocer Directamente Dicho Procedimiento, Por Lo Tanto Decide Rechazar Por Improcedente La Solicitud De Apertura De Incidente De Desacato.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Apertura Incidente De Desacato
  • Rechazar por improcedente
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de apertura de incidente de desacato de la Sentencia T-608 de 2008, promovida por la señora Nancy González Palma, cónyuge del señor Helbert Acosta.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR a la señora Nancy González Palma, cónyuge del señor Helbert Acosta, que el juez competente para conocer del incidente de desacato de la Sentencia T-608 de 2008 es el
  3. Décimo. Civil Municipal de Bogotá.
  4. Tercero. ORDENAR la remisión del escrito de solicitud de apertura de incidente de desacato de la Sentencia T-608 de 2008 al Juzgado
  5. Décimo. Civil Municipal de Bogotá, para que proceda conforme con sus competencias en la materia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Reporting justice
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
✓
Mauricio González Cuervo
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 2 →A. 329/09T-882/10 · cited 15 timesT-882/102010T-660/10 · cited 11 timesT-660/102010
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by2

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.